Moving to strategic metrics
tracking actions is easier but fails to capture
the business impact.
If your recruiting team is like most, you already track time to hire. It’s the most commonly used recruiting metric for good reason—it’s easy to measure and can set expectations— but it’s not the most strategic. It tells you how fast your team hires, but not how well.
A slow recruiter who hires 10 high performers is far more valuable than one who efficiently hires 25 poor performers.
Tactical metric s —like time to hire, candidates per hire, or offer acceptance rate—track the immediate actions of your recruiters. That’s a good starting point, but the future of recruiting will revolve around strategic metrics: those that measure the business outcomes of your team’s efforts—not just the actions they take.
The role of recruiting is rising. Shaping your business’s talent strategy will be just as important as executing it. To do that well, you’ll need to track the metrics that really matter.
If your recruiting team is like most, you already track time to hire. It’s the most commonly used recruiting metric for good reason—it’s easy to measure and can set expectations— but it’s not the most strategic. It tells you how fast your team hires, but not how well.
A slow recruiter who hires 10 high performers is far more valuable than one who efficiently hires 25 poor performers.
Tactical metric s —like time to hire, candidates per hire, or offer acceptance rate—track the immediate actions of your recruiters. That’s a good starting point, but the future of recruiting will revolve around strategic metrics: those that measure the business outcomes of your team’s efforts—not just the actions they take.
The role of recruiting is rising. Shaping your business’s talent strategy will be just as important as executing it. To do that well, you’ll need to track the metrics that really matter.